Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content


RIMS Position on Mandatory Medicare Reporting Requirements--March 31, 2009

Mandatory Insurance Reporting Requirements on Medicare Beneficiaries under Section III of the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Extension Act of 2007

Section 111 of the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Act of 2007 (MMSEA) requires group health plans, liability insurers, self-insurers, no-fault insurers, and workers’ compensation insurers to report information to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) about payments to Medicare beneficiaries to assist CMS in the coordination of benefits paid to individuals in which Medicare or Medicaid is one of the payers (Medicare beneficiaries). This information enables Medicare to stop making payments when another entity is required to pay and to facilitate recovering any payments Medicare has made in cases involving primary payers. [Medicare secondary payment (MSP) covers those situations in which Medicare does not have primary responsibility for paying the medical expenses of a Medicare beneficiary. For example, Medicare is a secondary payer to liability insurance (including self-insurance), no-fault insurance, and workers’ compensation.]

On August 1, 2008, CMS issued data collection requirements implementing MMSEA, which mandate reporting to CMS all payments, settlements, awards, and judgments that involve a Medicare recipient. Group health providers (GHPs) began complying on January 1, 2009 and liability insurers (including self-insurers), no-fault insurers, and workers’ compensation insurers were required to report all settlements, awards, judgments, and other payments that occur on or after July 1, 2009 on a quarterly basis. Failure to comply with the data reporting requirements could result in penalties of $1,000 per day for each claim not reported.

Non-GHPs (self-insureds and general liability insurance carriers) currently comply with obligations under the Medicare Secondary Payer Law by requiring in the settlement agreement the injured party or his or her attorney to notify Medicare of the settlement. The settlement amount is disbursed and the claim is closed. The MMSEA changes this process by requiring the non-GHPs to identify whether the individual is entitled to Medicare benefits and to provide required information about the beneficiary and the settlement or judgment to CMS.

RIMS filed comments with CMS on the data-reporting requirements, raising issues about the ability to obtain required social security numbers as well as questions about reporting structured settlements, document retention, handling claims with multiple insurance carriers, and costs of compliance.

An industry coalition, the Medicare Advocacy Recovery Coalition (MARC), in which RIMS has been participating, has been working on obtaining a delay in implementing the reporting requirements. CMS recently announced a three month delay in implementation of the MSP reporting process (until January 1, 2010) and established an interim reporting threshold of $5,000 which is phased down to $600 beginning January 2012. MARC now plans to address other implementation issues raised by the MSP program.

RIMS position is to advocate for an extension of time for non-GHP compliance and for modification of onerous reporting requirements.

For more information, contact:

Kathy Doddridge, RIMS Government Affairs Director, at (202) 659-3900 or

Nathan Bacchus, RIMS State and Regulatory Affairs Associate, at (212) 655-6215 or 



Risk Knowledge is a searchable library of relevant information for today's risk professionals. Available materials include RIMS Executive Reports, survey findings.

Search By Categories
Search By Types
Search By Date


Access the most comprehensive directory of solution providers for risk professionals.

Starr Companies

Starr Companies is an international, privately held, insurance, financial services, and investments organization...


Lloyd's is often the first to insure new, unusual or complex risks...

RWH Myers

RWH Myers is committed to helping the Risk Manager through business interruption and...


PwC understands that significant risk is rarely confined to discrete areas...